No new notifications.

πŸ“ My Feed

✍️ Add Post


Post Content 1000
 
Markup  

πŸ–ŠοΈ Markup


Posts and comments support the following markup:

  • **bold**
  • *italic*
  • ~~strikethrough~~
  • [u]underline[/u]
  • [color=red]red text[/color]
  • @username (limit 10)
  • #hashtag (limit 10)

πŸ‘οΈ Preview



one of those plonkers * 🌐 ⚠️ NSFW
The Spectacular Love Challenge

Mark your spot for this love-making extravaganza, from Sunday, February 11th to 17th. The criteria is based on this post https://trashepics.com/post/128/7/ , since I'm sooooo clever and can't think of my own spin on it.

1 Points) Movie with the word "Love" or other romance related words in title
2 Points) Individual killed while "making love" (not combined with #3 below)
3 Points) Two or more killed at the same time while "making love"
4 Points) Each person killed by a loved one (husband/wife, father/daughter,boyfriend/girlfriend. Basically immediate family or dating)

Edit, in case anyone's overlooking my contribution to the challenge:
0.5 Points) Two people getting laid
1 Point) Three or more getting laid


This is kind of a tough one to get good points for, unless you know movies that have scenes for those points. I'll probably default to movies with love words in the title. "Valentine" is a love word, and so is "kiss", "romance", "love", and many pornographic titles.

I will add a new option to this, not covered in the basic point setup. You'll can get half a point for every time two people are getting laid. If there's a threesome, go ahead and give yourself a full point. A lot of this challenge relies on people getting killed while going at it, so I figured I'd throw in some traditional love-making points as well.

The winner of this challenge will get an assortment of wonderful prizes, such as 1.) a boosted self-esteem, 2.) bragging rights among friends, and most importantly, 3.) the winner will never see that annoying floating heart image ever again!
+2

πŸ“ Reply to Post


  1000

πŸ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

Trash Idiot 🌐 ⚠️ NSFW
Passing Judgement, a lament reconfigured

So I watched the new Hellraiser movie last night, was probably a bit too drunk as immediately afterward i began writing a review here on TE and subsequently deleted the post by accident after a fairly lengthy alcohol iduced ramble on the Hellraiser series as a whole.

This morning i gave the film another go, sober, and may as well give the review another go. β€’β€’β€’contains spoilers for Hellraiser Judgement & other films from the franchiseβ€’β€’β€’

I love me some Hellriaser. The movies, the stories, the comics, the art, everything. I mention this so you have an idea of bias, or maybe more predisposition, in my writing about these films. I know the vast majority of them are bad, even terrible. I just don't care.

Anyway, we don't need a recap of the 9 films spanning 30 years leading up to this latest installment, everyone knows about Pinhead & co, but i'm gonna do a brief one all the same.
image
The Theatrical Years
Clive Barker adapts his own short story The Hellbound Heart into a movie, Hellraiser (1987). Given a decent amount of control for a first time director he delivers a twisted tale of lust, greed, obsession, madness and blood. And introduces us to the Cenobites.

Successful enough to spawn a sequel a year later we get Hellbound (1988), which is also well received. In '92 Pinhead becomes the focus of the franchise with Hell on Earth, one of the weaker entries with some needless backstory. Finally (as far as the cinematic releases go) Bloodline comes out in 96, part slasher in space, part origin story this movie is undeniably a mess (it has an Alan Smithee credit for director), but kinda entertaining nonetheless.

The DTV Years
After the relative disaster of HIV (ha!) the studio took to adapting original screenplays into Hellraiser flicks and blasting em out on video, mainly just so's Dimension could keep the rights.
image
Inferno (2000) is my favourite of the sequels, maybe the entire franchise. A psychological thriller in the vein of Angel Heart with Pinhead stuck on, or in, via a couple of cameos. There's also a Barker link as the film stars Nightbreed's own Craig Sheffer

Next up comes Hellseeker (2002), basically a poor repeat of the previous movie that brings Ashley Laurence back and heralds the start of the Rick Bota era. in 2005 Bota made back to back 'Raisers with Deader (awful) and Hellword (Lance!)

The Wilderness Years
Much like Henriksen's Host, Hellworld buries the franchise and almost kills it off entirely. Many mooted reboots and sequels are rumoured, including Clive's return, or Pascal Laugier lending some French extremity to the nightmare realm of the Cenobites, but nothing surfaces.

Until 2011 & Revelations. Ugh. Even i found this hard to stomach, not just for the total lack of budget (not necassarily a bad thing) the shoddy script, clunky acting, all this could be overlooked, but the betrayal of Doug Bradley was the straw that broke this donkey.
image
Englund is Freddy, Hodder is Jason, Bradley is Pinhead. Simple. Apparently not, the story goes 'they' refuses to let Doug read the script before signing on, and he was worried (correctly as it turns out) the new film might further tarnish an already battered series. One thing I will say about Revs is that it at least tries to be faithful to the original Hellraiser movie and universe, which is the least you'd expect when it's the first one written specifically to be a H movie since 1996.

Anyway, sorry that was meant to be brief, did ok for the first eight...

Hellraiser Judgement 2018
We open with Pinhead and what I presume to be The Auditor, a Cenobite or just Pinheads lackey, chatting about how to lure human souls in for the torturing. They flipping love that stuff.
This leads us to the Ludivico house of interrogation - immediately warning bells go off. Is writer/director/star Gary J Tunnicliffe suggesting I may have to clamp open my eyelids to endure the next 80mins? Surely this is better than Revelations, which he also wrote. And, thankfully, it is.

The Auditor presides over a sort of courthouse where he type up victim's confessions. These are then fed to a fat dude, who pukes up some blood into a funnel which syphons through to three topless top heavy blood honeys who deliver a verdict. Usually guilty is the impression that i get.
image
After which the victims are 'cleansed' then killed horrifically by a surgeon, or butcher, or both i dunno. The Jury (for that is what the semi nekkid ladies are) reminded me of Odd Nerdum's painting 'Dawn', which is pretty cool and was also referenced in another horror movie, Tarsem's The Cell. Fun fact: David Bowie owned the original painting.
image

All this is the ten min intro to the main story, a cop/serial killer one that we've all seen before. Once in this very franchise... Dude Bro Dets Carter & Carter, along with Token Lady Det Edgerton, are hunting for the Preceptor a violent serial killer who's murders have ritualistic elements.

We get a one scene cameo from Nancy, plenty of blood thrown around & some strange expansion of the Pinhead mythos with the introduction of Jophiel, who may be a fallen angel, or may not.

Meanwhile The Sheff is still chasing the Engineer (wrong one) Ahem. Meanwhile Dets Carters & Edgerton are still chasing the Prolapser and the religious Carter Jr is developing some nasty nightmares, where's this going? Yeah, there.

The finale sees some old friends return (flying chains, Jesus weeping) and a silly twist to presumably, er, justify the title.

Ultimately i enjoyed this 10th installment to the canon, but then i more or less like the other 9 too, making my opinion redundant and your reading this a waste of time...
+4

πŸ“ Reply to Post


  1000

πŸ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

Trash Person * 🌐 ⚠️ NSFW
The Ritual (2017)

image

I loved it up to the first half after they spent the first night into the cabin, palpable foreboding atmosphere but it went downhill after that point they couldn't sustain the eeriness up to the 3rd act that things are revealed it dwindled into a horror comedy.
+5

πŸ“ Reply to Post


  1000

πŸ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

The tit patrol, that's who! * 🌐 ⚠️ NSFW
Shot-On-Shiteo: Never Recycle Trash

image

Anyone ever wonder what became of crazy fat Ethel after that abrupt ending to Criminally Insane? Yeah, me either. As much as I would have loved an extra 15 minutes more of that movie, I'm good, and am definitely capable of using my imagination regarding the immediate and distant future of Ethel Janowski. So, no, Mr. Millard. That's quite alright. No need to risk making the worst part 2 in the history of part 2s just to give us Criminally Insane fans closure. That is, unless you have some really good ideas planned ... Just kidding. He already made it. That's just what I would have said to Nick Millard in 1987, had I heard about this and was someone he knew and listened to. I'm sure you get the joke. However, Criminally Insane 2 is no joke. At least I'm pretty sure it's not. Let's just assume this was an honest attempt at a movie, as we've been given no reason to think otherwise. Yet, one thing made abundantly clear right off the bat is that, somewhere between 1973 and 1987, Nick Millard became a lazy pile of shit.

image Adding filler to movies isn't exactly a crime, but that's not really what we're looking at, here, is it? We're looking at more than 60% of the runtime consisting of scenes from the original movie. And right after some familiar opening credits, the tone is set as we get a quick glimpse of Ethel in the mental hospital, only to be shown an immediate flashback which lasts thrice as long. Ethel sits there, day dreaming about the good old days during that short time period between grandmother's death and her inevitable capture. And even more tone setting as Ethel indulges in some old looking pudding after a light lunch. Ethel feels as if it wasn't enough and makes this known at the top of her lungs. At this point, we've practically already seen the entire movie.

The mental hospital where Ethel has been staying hasn't been getting the funding it needs and is being forced to release the less necessary patients. For some reason, they think Ethel fits into this category. She doesn't. One could make the case that she doesn't seem quite as delusional or dangerous as she once did but we can tell Ethel isn't sorry. We can tell she's still that crazy fat fuck who would kill a relative for a plate of baked potatoes. Ethel may have shed a few pounds, but she's still Ethel.

image As luck would have it, the nice people from the asylum hooked Ethel up with a spot in a halfway house, ran by Mrs. Bartholomew, whose motto is "We must never lose hope". And considering her first name is Hope, I'd say she really means this. Hope Bartholomew looks pretty old, but insists she's not Ethel's dead grandmother when accused. There's also some guy with a mustache, hanging around. Ethel thinks he's George "Buck" Flower, of all people. He's not.

After thinking about the events of the first movie for a while, Ethel takes a nap and dreams about the events of the first movie. Meanwhile, some idiot eats broth containing dead flies. Later on, the same idiot eats some dog food which Ethel thinks is funny. A few minutes later, she kills a guy for eating a candy bar in front of her, even though he had offered her one. After the much-needed laugh and murder, Ethel is all tuckered out and ready for another nap. During this nap, Ethel dreams about the events of the first movie. Later on, Ethel gets blackmailed out of her pudding by the mustache guy. Although I don't know why she even cares because it looks like that same old pudding from the asylum. But believe me. She cares! After a failed poisoning of her blackmailer, Ethel does the dishes, has an apple and stabs him to death. After thinking about stuff she did in the first movie, Ethel kills everyone else, leading to one last nap. You'll never believe what she dreams about, this time...

image What kind of careless dickhead does this? I get that not all directors take themselves or their movies super seriously, but this is so much more than an inferior sequel. And like I said, I don't even think this is a joke. Criminally Insane 2 is a scam. I'm not sure if Millard stood to make anything off this, but one afternoon in 1987, something resembling a sequel to Criminally Insane came to be. Like it or not. Whatever. I personally never asked for a sequel, so, this guy can shove it up his ass as far as I'm concerned. Seriously, though. It wouldn't have killed him to have a couple of those flashbacks take place during Ethel's stay at the nut house. Or if he was so in love with the original, why not remake it? Or do the sequel and have it be a short film. Literally anything but this would have been an improvement.

I couldn't help laughing when I watched Ethel, sitting there, eating pretzels. Even something so minor stays true to the tone of the movie. Think about it like this: We've gone from Exrta large Ethel to medium Ethel. We've gone from film to video. And yes. We have gone from watching Ethel choke down Nilla Wafers to sorry ass pretzels! You won't find one aspect that's not completely inferior to that of the original. One more thing I should point out. I've seen three post-Criminally Insane 2 films by Nick Millard. Death Nurse 1 and 2, and Cemetery Sisters. All three of these 60 minute SOVs include scenes from Criminally Insane, yet, none of them has a single thing to do with it. So, there's that. Take from it what you will. Well, maybe THAT was a joke? Maybe he got into drugs? Who knows? All I can say is Nick Millard is a real piece of work. 1/10

image

#Review
+4

πŸ“ Reply to Post


  1000

πŸ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

one of those plonkers 🌐 ⚠️ NSFW
Thoughts on Valentine's Day horror movies

The obvious three are My Bloody Valentine (1981), Valentine (2001), and My Bloody Valentine (2009). I think the original MBV is a solid 80s slasher, and the remake is great because Tom Atkins is in it. I try to watch them both every year, and this year, I'll get points for it. 😜

I don't remember much about Valentine, but it's due for a rewatch. I remember thinking it was kinda stupid, because his nose is always bleeding. What a loser he was.

It's also come to my attention that X-Ray is aka "By My Valentine, or Else..." (also aka "Hospital Massacre"), and that was another solid 1981 slasher. I don't remember much to do with the actual holiday or love themes, but I want to give it a rewatch anyway.

Also, the 1972 Tales from the Crypt has that segment with Peter Cushing where he receives all those wonderful valentines cards from the children.

Never saw Picnic at Hanging Rock yet, but that's set on V-Day apparently.



I totally googled this list, but it looks like Valentine's Day doesn't have a lot of other horror titles to offer. I still don't understand why MBV never started a franchise. Even the remake was fun, despite it's stupid twist ending.

πŸ“ Reply to Post


  1000

πŸ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

Existentialist 🌐 ⚠️ NSFW
Your favorite TV Horror Movie(s) ?

TV movies nowadays rightly get a bad rap with poor writing, low production values, and intrusive commercial breaks.. However, back in the 1970s, made-for-TV horror movies were a genre unto themselves. Many of those TV movies are still highly watchable, memorable, and have even enjoyed big budget remakes. I seen a lot of good TV horror movies over the past couple of years so here is what I really liked:

Don't Go to Sleep 1982
The Demon Murder Case 1983
The Haunted 1991
The Woman in Black 1989
Salem's Lot 1979
Count Dracula 1977
House Of Lost Souls 1989
No Place to Hide 1981
Desire: The Vampire 1982
When Michael Calls 1972
Scream, Pretty Peggy 1973
A Taste of Evil 1971
The Sight 2000
The Norliss Tapes 1973
I Can Make You Love Me 1993
The Night Stalker 1972
Grave Halloween 2013
13 Gantry Row 1998
Possessed 2000
The Lottery 1996
Dark Night of the Scarecrow 1981
Vampire 1979
Bay Coven 1987
Sudden Fury 1993
The Covenant 1985
Reflections of Murder 1974
Threads 1984
Black Noon 1971
The Dead Don't Die 1975
Spare Parts 1979
Dead of Night 1977
Satans Triangle 1975
Bram Stoker's Dracula 1974
Blackout 1985
The Night Strangler 1973
Ants 1977
Crowhaven Farm 1970
Satan's School For Girls 1973
Killdozer 1974
Gargoyles 1972
Sometimes They Come Back 1991
Desperation 2006
Grave Secrets: The Legacy of Hilltop Drive 1992
Nightmare on the 13th Floor 1990
A Warning to the Curious 1972
Dream House 1998
Trilogy of Terror 1975
Body Bags 1993
Deep Evil 2004
House of Clocks 1989
House Of Witchcraft 1989
Mania 1986
She Waits 1972
The World Beyond 1978
Night Cries 1978
The Darker Side of Terror 1979
Daughter of the Mind 1969
Sticenik 1973
The Haunting of Sarah Hardy 1989
The Stone Tape 1972
The House That Would Not Die 1970
Alien Abduction: Incident in Lake County 1998
Trilogy of Terror II 1996
The Spell 1977
The Night Nurse 1978
The She-Butterfly 1973
Bad Ronald 1974
The Devil's Daughter 1973
The Screaming Woman 1972
How Awful About Allan 1970
A Cold Night's Death 1973
The Strange and Deadly Occurrence 1974
The Intruder Within 1981
Don't Be Afraid of the Dark 1973
Cruise Into Terror 1978
Crawlspace 1972

So what are some of your favorite TV Horror movie(s) ?
+3

πŸ“ Reply to Post


  1000

πŸ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

one of those plonkers 🌐 ⚠️ NSFW
Horror Hosts

I'm not terribly familiar with a lot of them, because I rarely catch anything I watch on a program that would be hosted by horror-themed character, but you gotta love the effort.


Elvira was popular enough to spawn a charming b-movie about her inhereting a haunted house. She's still going, but I've heard on and off again things about her retiring. I guess she can't get enough of it.

I don't know anything about Vampira, whom Elvira was based on, besides what I've seen in the movie "Ed Wood".

Svengoolie is based in Chicago, which is close to where I grew up, but surprisingly, I've never seen much of him.

I think a favorite of many people is Joe Bob Briggs from Monster-Vision. Again, I've never seen that show, but I know Joe Bob from a few dvd commentaries, and for his scene in 'Casino'. I also gotta love the man for liking Texas Chainsaw 4. There is talk of bringing this show back.

Who else is there...

John Kassir played the Crypt-Keeper for many years, and that show was great. They're still trying to bring that one back, but without a crypt-keeper?

Of course, Freddy Krueger also hosted a decent anthology series, too. Maybe by these standards, you can also count Alfred Hitchcock as a host, if he "presents" so many stories.


Thoughts on horror hosts? Who's your favorite? Who am I missing?
+1

πŸ“ Reply to Post


  1000

πŸ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

Skumbagg 🌐 ⚠️ NSFW
OT: Surgery

I had surgery today on my poor, dicky wicky. Dont worry, I'm OK (in the head, not so much). Taking a nap with that sweet, sweet anaesthesia is fucking glorious. Wish i could suck that shit down every night to go to bed.

What surgeries have you had in your past? Does surgery make you nervous? I suppose for something serious, surely it would. I had surgery roughly 13 years ago to fix a deviated septum and the nausea and vomiting afterwards was pure hell. Thankfully none of that today.
+1

πŸ“ Reply to Post


  1000

πŸ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

one of those plonkers 🌐 ⚠️ NSFW
The Extremes of Horror...

I just added a few "Faces of Death" titles to the db, because I know they've got a reputation. Still, after all these years of being a horror fan, I haven't seen any of them. There are a few horror films I haven't been especially anxious to visit, because some of them cross a line. With horror fans, it's hard to find out exactly where that line is, because horror is all about testing your boundaries and getting out of your comfort zone.

So what are your limits? Are there movies you wont see? Snuff, or psuedo-snuff? Perhaps it's all fake, otherwise it would be criminal evidence. Personally, I'm not too keen on real-life violence. If I see enough blood, I'll probably hurl. I've gotten to the point where I can eat while watching certain gore scenes and not think anything of it. But if it was real gore, it becomes quite different. So here' s a sub-topic. Snuff Films: Are any of them real?

I sure fucking hope not, but these days, you can never tell. Usually, you can tell if something is fake because they'll cut to a different angle. Continuous takes might convince me, but again, I'm hoping not to be convinced.


"Torture Porn" movies like saw are grouped in with the extremes a lot, even though they're theatrical releases. While movies like "Saw" and "Hostel" are gross enough, does their mainstream appeal dig into their extreme credibility any?



Of course, there are movies that aren't very graphic, that still can get under your skin. "Megan is Missing" was a recent one for me. There are only brief glimpses into the real horror, but that movie haunted me for weeks.


There has been talk of an extreme challenge. That would be a time to test your intestinal fortitude. What do you consider extreme? I Spit on Your Grave? The French wave of extreme horror? Cannibal Holocaust? A Serbian Film? (and for the ones I haven't seen) Faces of Death? Guinea Pig? August Underground? Men Behind the Sun?

When does it become too far? What are your thoughts, and what makes a horror movie "extreme"? We've come a long way from the video-nasty days, when that stuff was considered intense. Now, it's on youtube, and considered rather tame. 😐


Browse titles: Extreme/Horror movies https://junkepics.com/film/?tags=extreme,horror&category=1&sort=value
or artwork view
https://junkepics.com/film/?tags=extreme,horror&category=1&sort=value&display=1&limit=25
+3

πŸ“ Reply to Post


  1000

πŸ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

Thrash Person 🌐 ⚠️ NSFW
What's the most you've ever paid for a single movie?

A few years ago I spent $100 on Last House on Dead End Street (1977). Big regrets on that purchase, I thought the movie sucked.

πŸ“ Reply to Post


  1000

πŸ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

1 ... 221 222 223 ... 344   3431 results